A local government or a person acting on behalf of local government may not expend or authorize the expenditure of, and a person or group may not accept, public funds for a political advertisement or any other communication sent to electors concerning an issue, referendum, or amendment, including any state question, that is subject to a vote of the electors. This subsection applies to a communication initiated by a local government or a person acting on behalf of a local government, irrespective of whether the communication is limited to factual information or advocates for the passage or defeat of an issue, referendum, or amendment. This subsection does not preclude a local government or a person acting on behalf of a local government from reporting on official actions of the local government’s governing body in an accurate, fair, and impartial manner; posting factual information on a government website or in printed materials; hosting and providing information at a public forum; providing factual information in response to an inquiry; or providing information as otherwise authorized or required by law.
With the exception of the prohibitions specified in subsection (2), this section does not preclude an elected official of the local government from expressing an opinion on any issue at any time.
Elected officials can always express their opinions or advocate on an issue/referendum that is put before voters.
Local bureaucrats or those hired from the outside to represent the local government cannot do that. There are restrictions because taxpayer money cannot be used for electioneering which is an abusive use of taxpayer dollars.
Transportation engineering is a branch of civil engineering dealing with the planning, designing, operations and maintenance of a transportation system.
At the June 2nd BOCC meeting, when County staff recommended hiring HNTB, they presented the work order for hiring HNTB.
HNTB's campaign website tells the public the County needs to repave local roads on a 20 year schedule.
However, an April 19, 2022 memo to the county commissioners about what the $23B transit tax will fund from Asst. County Administrator for Public Works John Lyons, paints a very different picture.
Directly relating to the tax hike, Lyons April 19th memo states the "system would be resurfaced about every 30 years."
The County tells the public the AFT transit tax will resurface roads every 20 years but the Public Works Director tells the commissioners the tax will resurface the roads every 30 years.
Lyons memo also told the commissioners the $23B transit tax will build out the Greenways Master Plan for Trails at an estimated cost of $273M. Funding Trails is not found in Florida Statute 212.055 Section 1 that governs what the proceeds of local Transportation Sales surtaxes can be spent on.
Lyons also told the commissioners only 25-30 miles of new road capacity "could" be funded with the massive take hike - over 30 years.
Where is the voting public told directly told this? Where is the voting public told that because there is no dedicated funding for new road capacity in the mandated spending allocations, there could be zero miles of new roads built.
Lyons April 19 memo is not found on HNTB's transit tax campaign website. But it includes important information that voters should know and have access to before they vote.
HART's 10 year Transportation Development Plan (TDP) is not found on HNTB's transit tax campaign website. Why not?
It is reasonable to assume since an engineering firm is being paid $700K to manage the campaign website, they would ensure all responses to questions would be direct, accurate and factual.
With congestion relief a top concern, we submitted some questions thru the campaign website asking how much congestion relief will the $23B transit tax provide.
The response we received via email included a link directing us to an outdated 20 year transportation plan created by another organization, the Hillsborough County Transportation Planning Organization (TPO).
That is unacceptable. A transportation engineering firm being paid $700K of taxpayer money should be able to tell the public what congestion relief benefits a 30 year $23B tax hike will provide. Sending the public to an inaccurate, stale and outdated TPO 20 year plan is outrageous.
Why would the public just now be told the 30 year $23B AFT transit tax is funding an outdated TPO 20 year plan? Where's the rest of the money going?
The public was never told this information at the April 20, 2022 public hearing.
HNTB has no reference to the TPO's 20 year plan on their transit tax campaign website.
HNTB's work order included informing the about projects the transit tax would fund...for growth, safety, transit and "enhanced traffic movement" (congestion relief, congestion reduction was not used).
But HNTB includes no list of actual projects the transit tax will fund on the transit tax campaign website.
The County/HNTB is not providing accurate, fair and impartial information on the transit tax campaign website.
The County makes it appear to the public as if the County put $353M from FY22 revenues into transportation in FY22. That is a ruse because the vast majority of those funds had already been appropriated previously. The County added only $84M from FY22 revenues as property tax revenues skyrocketed.
HNTB's transit tax campaign website misleads the public with charts that use 6 years of revenues to cover 10 years of needs. That OVERSTATES the funding shortfall. That is basic math.
HNTB's $700K taxpayer funded transit tax "education" campaign is walking on a tight rope with one leg.
Excluding Lyons memo with important information from the campaign website is unacceptable.
Directing the public to an outdated, inaccurate and not factual 20 year LRTP from the TPO is unacceptable....especially when a transportation engineering firm is managing the campaign.
Misleading the public by using 6 years of revenue against 10 years of needs to overstate the funding shortfall is unacceptable. That is not impartial, that is biased.
The County knew the All for Transportation PAC had millions from their wealthy special interests donors to fund another AFT transit tax campaign....just as they did in 2018.
That was not enough for the Tampa Centric 5 commissioners. They forced taxpayers to pay for another campaign and hired HNTB.
Statute 106.113 requires that when taxpayer funds are used to communicate with the public about a referendum issue, the information must be factual, accurate, fair and unbiased.
Does the HNTB $700K taxpayer funded transit tax campaign pass that smell test?
Or make the $23B AFT transit take hike an even costlier and bigger three ring circus?
Couldn't the County find a way to manage their infrastructure with the record-setting property tax revenue collection for 2021?ReplyDelete